move to quad9 dns resolvers for improved privacy profiling
while google dns infrastructure similar to cloudfare maintains good coverage and low latency it would be nice to see quad9 utilised since they are known for better privacy measures
this is a proposal pr, please review and discuss.
this pr proposes the following changeset:
- move away from using google dns resolvers
- move to quad9 dns resolvers for improved privacy profiling
-----
while google dns infrastructure similar to cloudfare maintains good coverage and low latency it would be nice to see quad9 utilised since they are known for better privacy measures
this is a proposal pr, please review and discuss.
Had some discussions today regarding this PR, some points to consider:
quad9 is managed by IBM
9.9.9.9 filters domains
While it is may be better as it is not Google, it is not a best choice in terms of privacy. Accepting the PR, putting this task to backlog.
Had some discussions today regarding this PR, some points to consider:
- quad9 is managed by IBM
- 9.9.9.9 filters domains
While it is may be better as it is not Google, it is not a best choice in terms of privacy. Accepting the PR, putting this task to backlog.
this pr proposes the following changeset:
while google dns infrastructure similar to cloudfare maintains good coverage and low latency it would be nice to see quad9 utilised since they are known for better privacy measures
this is a proposal pr, please review and discuss.
in case there is more review required, i deployed this configuration shortly after time of pull request. no regressions that i could find.
Had some discussions today regarding this PR, some points to consider:
While it is may be better as it is not Google, it is not a best choice in terms of privacy. Accepting the PR, putting this task to backlog.
8fc64e74fd
into master 9 months agoReviewers
8fc64e74fd
.