Labels Milestones

updates resolvers with quad9 #24

Merged

inex merged 2 commits from :master into master 3 months ago

Conversation 2 Commits 2 Files Changed 1

Ghost commented 3 months ago

this pr proposes the following changeset:

• move away from using google dns resolvers
• move to quad9 dns resolvers for improved privacy profiling

---

while google dns infrastructure similar to cloudfare maintains good coverage and low latency it would be nice to see quad9 utilised since they are known for better privacy measures

this is a proposal pr, please review and discuss.

this pr proposes the following changeset: - move away from using google dns resolvers - move to quad9 dns resolvers for improved privacy profiling ----- while google dns infrastructure similar to cloudfare maintains good coverage and low latency it would be nice to see quad9 utilised since they are known for better privacy measures this is a proposal pr, please review and discuss.

👍 2

Ghost added 2 commits 3 months ago

0ca9b7fb75 changes to quad9 upstream resolvers

e05d7a6aa4 Merge pull request 'changes to quad9 upstream resolvers' (#1) from sova/change-upstream-resolvers-to-quad9 into master ...

Reviewed-on: sova/selfprivacy-nixos-infect#1

def requested review from inex 3 months ago

inex was assigned by def 3 months ago

inex added the

Pending testing

label 3 months ago

inex removed their assignment 3 months ago

Ghost commented 3 months ago

Poster

in case there is more review required, i deployed this configuration shortly after time of pull request. no regressions that i could find.

in case there is more review required, i deployed this configuration shortly after time of pull request. no regressions that i could find.

inex commented 3 months ago

Owner

Had some discussions today regarding this PR, some points to consider:

• quad9 is managed by IBM
• 9.9.9.9 filters domains

While it is may be better as it is not Google, it is not a best choice in terms of privacy. Accepting the PR, putting this task to backlog.

Had some discussions today regarding this PR, some points to consider: - quad9 is managed by IBM - 9.9.9.9 filters domains While it is may be better as it is not Google, it is not a best choice in terms of privacy. Accepting the PR, putting this task to backlog.

inex merged commit 8fc64e74fd into master 3 months ago

inex referenced this issue from a commit 3 months ago

Merge pull request 'updates resolvers with quad9' (#24) from sova/selfprivacy-nixos-infect:master into master

Reviewers

inex was requested for review 3 months ago

The pull request has been merged as 8fc64e74fd.

Sign in to join this conversation.

Reviewers

Request review

No reviewers

inex

Labels

Apply labels

Clear labels

Bug
Discovered issue that affects regular operation Errata
Known issue with available workaround Feature request
Functionality/usability enchansement Fixed
Issue resolved in one of the application/backend releases No resolution
Issue is not queued for resolution due to architecture pecularities Pending release
Fix is ready. Implementation is pending Pending testing
This PR has to be tested in real world scenario before merging Under investigation
Issue details are currently being investigated Under resolution
Pending fix development

No Label Bug Errata Feature request Fixed No resolution Pending release Pending testing Under investigation Under resolution

Milestone

Set milestone

Clear milestone

No items

No Milestone

Assignees

Assign users

Clear assignees

No Assignees

2 Participants

Notifications

Subscribe

Due Date

The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: SelfPrivacy/selfprivacy-nixos-infect#24

Write Preview

Loading…

Cancel

Save

There is no content yet.