selfprivacy-rest-api/selfprivacy_api/backup/providers/local_file.py

from .provider import AbstractBackupProvider
from selfprivacy_api.backup.backuppers.restic_backupper import ResticBackuper


class LocalFileBackup(AbstractBackupProvider):
    backuper = ResticBackuper("", "", ":local:")
    name = "FILE"
feature(backups): localfile repo 2023-02-20 13:32:25 +02:00			`from .provider import AbstractBackupProvider`
refactor(backups): make a dir for backuppers 2023-06-16 18:48:58 +03:00			`from selfprivacy_api.backup.backuppers.restic_backupper import ResticBackuper`
feature(backups): localfile repo 2023-02-20 13:32:25 +02:00

			`class LocalFileBackup(AbstractBackupProvider):`
refactor(backups): make localfile repos normal 2023-06-14 17:07:51 +03:00			`backuper = ResticBackuper("", "", ":local:")`
refactor(api): Group mutations I've learned that there is no problem in grouping mutations like we do with queries. This is a big mistake from my side, now we have legacy not so conveniently placed endpoints. I've grouped all mutations, left the copies of old ones flattened in the root for backwards compatibility. We will migrate to mutation groups on client side, and backups now only use grouped mutations. Tests are updated. 2023-06-21 06:46:56 +03:00			`name = "FILE"`